Hits To The Head Revisited
ARTHUR:
Injurious head shots seem to be grabbing headlines every day this season, and one has finally landed in the Pacific Division as James Wisniewski erased Shane Doan at Jobing.com on Saturday, a hit which garnered the Ducks defenseman a two-game suspension.
Daniel, you and I have already said our peace on the NHL regulating the shoulder check to the head, but let's talk about another controversial prong of this issue. Assuming that not every player is trying to put a shoulder into a guy's head, but most are aware that they will likely make shoulder-to-head and not shoulder-to-chest contact, is the shoulder check to the head a dirty play?
DANIEL:
Before I answer the question, I have to admit that I'm starting to waver on this issue a little. When I was watching the Phoenix game, Brian Hayward mentioned that players seem to be getting hurt more due to the speed of the game and the increasing size of the players. This sentiment was echoed in the Ottawa Citizen by Bryan Murray, who feels the game's faster pace has left more players caught with their head down and hit with harder hits.
It's undeniable that the game is moving much faster than in previous years, and guys are flying into boards, flying into each other and flying into goaltenders. USA Today's Kevin Allen claims that roughly 18% of the league's regulars are currently injured or ill. In this environment, I think players should start making the extra effort with each other to prevent more injuries, especially career-ending injuries. I don't know if crashing into guys who are speeding through the neutral zone while looking back for a stretch pass is "dirty," but it certainly isn't safe. I love fast-paced physical hockey, but pretty soon there won't be anybody to play that style, because they will all be hurt.
My answer to the question is that I don't think these shoulder hits to the head are dirty. Taking the body is part of this sport, one of the most exciting parts. But maybe, guys need to be more responsible in their hit selection. Standing a guy up doesn't mean you have to bury him. Ultimately, players need to be more responsible for their hits. I'm not saying you shouldn't hit a guy skating with his head down, but you should maybe avoid a 100% shoulder follow through. If the guy can't see you coming, it's better not to lower the boom. That way, our favorite superstars can stay on the ice, instead of ruining our fantasy hockey seasons.
ARTHUR:
First, I just want to say that I honestly believe that not every player is attempting to catch a guy in the head with his shoulder; it's not just an assumption I created for the purposes of this question. In fact, it's an assumption made in many sports. Soccer players aren't always booked or suspended for kicking a guy in the head when he's going for a header. The referee assumes the player was trying to make a legal play on the ball, but you'll never convince the injured player's fans of that.
And it's the fans that really drive the 'dirty' discussion. They see their guy laid out or put onto a stretcher, and the perpetrator is automatically a dirty player in their eyes. But a play isn't dirty just because it injured someone. A textbook hip check can injure someone too, but I've never heard Rob Blake called dirty for it. And you and I never called Scott Stevens dirty for putting his shoulder into Paul Kariya or anyone else's head, whether he came laterally at them or skated straight into them.
I agree that rule changes have made the game faster, and maybe placed it at odds with itself, but there is a legal, purposeful and traditional hockey hit underneath all this controversy. And it's NOT akin to helmet-to-helmet tackles or head-slapping in the old NFL. In last year's playoffs, when Brown dropped Hudler, the TSN crew had a lively debate about it, but Bob McKenzie rolled tape on textbook shoulder checks to the chest executed elsewhere in the playoffs, checks that were completely harmonious with today's NHL. The shoulder check still has a place in the game.
People who want the NHL to do more about it aren't wrong, but people who claim players should keep their heads up aren't wrong either. Not every player is trying to cheapshot Blair Betts out there. Most are just trying to execute a solid check, and they have enough professional respect for each other to hope the other guy gets up or sees them coming in the first place.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
I wanted to watch this one again, so thanks boys.
You know, they did so much talking about players being injured and that being a big reason for some of these suspensions- yet Doan stays in the game and gets his revenge in the form of a fight.
I’m understanding of them trying to make the game “safer” or whatever, but this was a bad example. Wisniewski isn’t even charging for Doan and is simply trying to hold the line on the guy; I think it’s a great hit.
You mentioned the intent to injure, and that is clearly not the case here. I’m really disappointed in the NHL on this one.
GO DUCKS!!!
DUCKSandPUCKS.com
SKeleven on Twitter
by SK eleven on Nov 2, 2009 4:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the reminder. I forgot to list the suspension. As always, Wiz could probably use the healing time. I think he was hobbled after one of those shot blocks.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Nov 2, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to be This Guy...
… But Doan’s head is down watching the puck for about a second beforehard. It probably should have been an elbowing penalty (from what I could see in the video), but it’s just a stand-up check at the blueline, and it’s pretty clear his intention was not to hit Shane in the head or really injure him, more than any other legitimate hit in the game.
UNRELATED: Handel is the most overrated composer ever...
by Bleys on Nov 2, 2009 4:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I definitely agree. Daniel had said to me earlier that the key here was that he initiated contact with his forearm into the chest. Of course, the cynic in me wonders if that’s not Wisniewski measuring him to make sure his shoulder can’t land anywhere below the neck, but if Doan’s head didn’t snap forward, this might have just been a forearm to the chest.
More than likely, Wiz saw Doan looking down, trying to make a move around him and opening his shoulders. You see a guy give you his chest, it’s like prey giving the predator its belly. You gotta hit that guy.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Nov 2, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t believe Wisniewski got suspended. If Campbell only doles out punishment when he’s in the mood, blogs will get really boring, because all we’ll be talking about is junk like this.
by Daniel AC on Nov 2, 2009 4:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ahlers and Hayward mentioned it in the game . . .
But this is why Ducks fans have very little sympathy for Doan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gH68TlyTTaM
If I remember correctly, Fedoruk laid a tough check on the Coyotes earlier in the game, and Doan was sent to retaliate because, as a star player, neither he nor Gretzky would be punished for starting a fight in the last five minutes of the game.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Nov 2, 2009 5:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think a lot of those hits to the head are necessarily “dirty”, which is an inflammatory word, but I do think that the game could do without them. Remember, the normal (non-Bertuzzi) intention of such hits, at their worst, is usually to make the guy think twice, to make him flinchy, to make him hesitate to chase the puck in the corner or to try to drive the net again. And that’s a perfectly good intention, which definitely belongs in the game of hockey. But that intent can be met without drilling a moving 200lb mass through someone’s head. To me, that’s the key. I’ve got a couple ideas on curbing some of the unnecessary injurious hits that are made, that I want to get up on CLS sometime soon.
http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.
by IAmJoe on Nov 3, 2009 12:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s a pretty big jump to say the intention of these hits at their worst is an intimidation ploy and then to say that these hits can be done away with because those worst intentions can be achieved in other ways. What about the intentions at their best?
The shoulder check to the chest isn’t just an intimidation play. A lot of times it’s the smart hockey play. Yes, there are gentler ways to separate player from puck, but a finished open ice check takes the man out of the play. And I think the open ice hip check has become a lost art because when it’s missed, the defender is taken out of the play instead of the attacker. But if you can get a guy in the chest, you always take the shot, because it gives you the best chance to separate him from the puck AND knock him off his skates. It really is the smart play, which is why we’re seeing players who aren’t traditional goons execute it.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Nov 3, 2009 1:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But how the Wiz got suspended when the game ref who was the head NHL ref at one time at least didn’t even see fit to penalize the freaking hit he thought so little of it, then the league steps in to lay down the law? Pure crap, any coincidence that the league owns the yotes???
by peteyweestro on Nov 3, 2009 8:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
From what I’ve read, the league is saying it was a forearm to the head. It really looks to me like he puts his forearm into the chest, but I guess they have Hi-Def and additional angles, etc.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Nov 4, 2009 1:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 









