Lapierre's Impact?
Like most ducks fans I had no idea who Maxim Lapierre was when the trade was announced and assumed that it was another lackluster move from Murray. After doing some research on the guy I think (going out on a huge limb here) Lapierre is exactly the type of piece this team was missing, and could really help the Ducks in the second half.
Man is this guy polarizing. Its either "I was so glad he was on our team" or "what a punk that never backs up his talk". Yes he is a very good agitator, and no he doesn't fight, but that brings me back to why I think he is perfect for this Ducks team. People know that Parros is looking to fight and will drop the gloves, but its much more frustrating for the other team when you wanna fight someone but they wont. It will get them to make mistakes and commit penalties and that type of player is exactly what the ducks have been lacking.
Ever since the new owners took over, the ducks have tried to have a "smash mouth" identity that was about checking, intimidating, crashing the net, and winning games. Other teams and fans hated us, but we won and therefore they respected us. What two players optimized this more than Perry and Pronger? But ever since Pronger and Burke left that identity has slowly disappeared and been replaced with...........nothing. Everyone (even the players it seems) knows that one of the reasons this team has struggled this year is due to a lack of identity (especially with the third line). If we can get back that identity, and get back to playing "Ducks" hockey, then I think we will begin to see the team performing to expectations. Lapierre embodies that identity, and while he doesnt have the skills of a Perry or Pronger, he can bring out the "smash mouth" in the rest of the team by just playing his game.
So where does this leave the line ups? Well there are plenty of options (and knowing Carlyle well see all of them) where i think he can be successful but im just gonna focus on two.
1) FIRST LINE: "Lapierre-Getzlaf-Perry" He's played wing before and can skate pretty well. The major question here is whether or not he can keep up with the level of talent he would be playing with and against (the answer probably being no). But imagine the havok and disruption mentally a line with him AND Perry AND Getzlaf would cause. Plus we all know that the twins always play their best when the games are dirty and the trash talk is heavy. You get someone out there who is checking and getting the other team upset and i bet Perry and Getzlaf get back to forechecking constantly and playing well.
2) THIRD LINE: "Blake-Lapierre-Lupul" A more likely situation is that Lapierre will be used as a third or fourth liner. One thing that was talked about in the players and coaches meeting before the Phoenix game was getting back to having a "checking line" rather than attempting to have three scoring lines. Blake is one of the teams best forecheckers and Lupul has done well on the third line since coming back. Add in Lapierre and you have a group that is likely to work hard on keeping the puck in the other teams zone and continuously check hard. Also Blake and Lupul know how to score goals so this line could end up putting a lot of pucks on net and points on the board. You move either Ryan down to the second line or put someone like sexton there and I think the ducks gain much more than they loose by moving down Blake.
I know a lot of people are saying that this is very lackluster move, but I think it could end up being Murray's best move this year besides signing Lydman and Lilja (drafting Fowler should have been a no brainer). Could this move end up doing nothing? Of course. Could Lapierre only play a game or two before Carlyle gives up on him? More than likely. But i think if given a chance this could be the little piece that the team needed to start playing closer to their potential. And if not? Well we can always go back to the "cross our fingers and hope we squeeze into the 8 seed" game we've been doing the first half of the year.
This article is user-generated. It does not necessarily reflect the views of Anaheim Calling. Please do not link this article as representative of Anaheim Calling content or viewpoints . . . unless it's really really good.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
from what i have seen of lapierre i see a mike brown minus the fighting but maybe a little more skill. he is going to bring alot of energy and hopefully spark guys like getzlaf and others that seem content with playing with just skill and no passion or work. the few times i went to montreal for games this guy was loved by the fans. he brought a real energy to the place
Man I hope all your optimism comes true…LaPierre is hated as a diver and trash talker extrordinaire…he is the French version of Avery, without the scoring….I hope the change of scenery works magic….as he is a minus player at the moment, and has 5 goals so far…I will join you in optimisitic medidtation..Go Lappy
Lapierre
Personally, I think that this is a great move for the Ducks. Anyone who has seen Lapierre knows the energy and enthusiasm he “CAN” bring to the game. Whether he does or not is a different question. I am always worried when a french player leaves the francophone hotbed of Montreal, but as Latendresse has proven it can help their career. I have to agree with the author of this post, this could be one of the essential moves in making the Ducks a potential top 6 team in the West. I also agree his versatility is an asset and he could essentially make a impact on ever line. I especially like the idea of him playing with Getz and Perry but the chances of him sticking there are pretty remote, even though I think it would be his ideal position. He can score a few goals here and there and his unbridled enthusiasm when he does will be a boon to the Ducks. However, it is his energy and grit which will serve the Ducks the best. I’ll tell you what, when I found out Murray acquired Lapierre for a plug and a pick I had a smile on my face. Go Ducks!
A lot of what I’m reading here is similar to the things that were said when we got Chipchura from Montreal. Lapierre is seen as a bottom 6 guy who can play with the type of energy and bonus scoring that makes him a unique bottom 6 asset. I suppose there is an argument that Lapierre is a big pest, but I don’t think that’s really “Ducks Hockey”. Personally, I think the last thing we need is a pest. We already have an unearned reputation for being a poor sport team, to put it mildly. The last thing we need is someone contributing to that image. I would have preferred a real energy guy in the mold of Travis Moen to this cast off.
He might have a big impact, but this is move is nothing other than Murray claiming another asset that a team didn’t want. Every now and then those moves produce players that have an impact. The real question is, for how long will he have an impact?
Agreed
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think this move is “the trade of the year” or it makes up for all of Murray’s other mistakes (Beauchemin?). I doubt he even realized that he has the potential to do any of the things mentioned. Instead, like he did with Lilija, he got a guy that could temporarily fill a need with some players injured and he probably wanted to give Festerling a chance like he did with Mikkleson. I would argue that our reputation isn’t one as “poor sports” but is more of a team that gets away with things and bothers people, due to guys like Perry and formerly Pronger, and that its much how i feel about the red wings. I see them get away with a ton of crap and they wine all the time, but I have to (grudgingly) respect them due to the fact that they win and they technically are playing within the rules.
By “poor sports”, I mean people think we are dirty goons who resort to violence when we can’t win. We and the red wings have little to nothing in common. They get away with things because referees give them the benefit of the doubt; we are penalized on marginal calls because the league at large perceives us as dirty.
Lapierre has the potential to be a fan favorite here as well. Fans here, me included, were quite ecstatic when the ducks shed the image of grace and donned the smash mouth style. Even our stars now seem to play better when they’re on edge. But if last year taught us anything, it is that the players that finish their checks are as important as the players that cash the big ones. We are dealing with it still as we have a “big for nothing” Sutton out there stick checking opponents and 3rd and fourth line players that finish checks on their back sides more often then they knock over the opponents. If someone can come in and add that grit to our line up, I’m all for it. We’ll just see if he can do it.
the also has the looks of a precursory move such as sending Beleskey, McMillan or Bonino back down to Syracuse or maybe a trade package for future draft picks.
I don’t see McMillan going anywhere. Bonino I think could get shipped back with all the trouble the Crunch were having. Beleskey could stay for a while since he just got back up here.
by Newport Rebel on Jan 3, 2011 5:20 AM PST up reply actions

by 

















