Ducks Can't Connect On Chances, Fall 5-3 to Minnesota
Well that sucked. After a strong first period that saw them score two quick goals, the Ducks gave up a late short-handed goal that seemed to suck the life out of them. In the second period, the Ducks looked tired and slow, and Minnesota swarmed through the neutral zone to pick up every loose puck. The Wild struck twice in the span of 32 seconds in the second, giving them a 3-2 lead heading into the third.
Anaheim came out firing in the third, displaying the effort and style of play we saw in the first two periods against Philadelphia. While the Ducks threw shot after shot at Josh Harding, they just couldn't finish the many, many chances they generated. Ryan Getzlaf and Saku Koivu each hit posts on relatively wide-open nets and Teemu Selanne was unable to corral a beautiful cross-crease feed to put one behind an out-of-position Harding. While Cam Fowler scored off a Minnesota skate in the third to tie the game at 3-3, the Wild got their own flukey goal when Nick Johnson directed a Cal Clutterbuck feed past Jonas Hiller. The Ducks got their share of opportunities during a late power play (including the aforementioned chance from Selanne), but it was Minnesota that was able to capitalize on the empty net, sealing the game 5-3.
The Good- Although they both missed open looks late in the game, Saku Koivu and Teemu Selanne each had tremendous games. They played much of the first half of the game with Matt Beleskey and finished the game with Bobby Ryan on their wing, the second line was the Ducks' best all night. I think Teemu and Saku have best adapted to Bruce Boudreau's system, utilizing their speed and passing ability as they enter the zone to create havoc. Both Beleskey and Ryan played well on the wings, each adding the ability to dig pucks out and set-up the Finns.
- The power play continues to look strong under Boudreau. For the second straight game, the Ducks netted a goal with the man advantage, and my God it was a beauty. Teemu Selanne feathered a pass to Corey Perry, who in one move directed it over to a wide-open Ryan Getzlaf for the goal.
- Bruce rolled all four of his lines fairly effectively, with JF Jacques getting the least amount of ice time at 5:25. One of the things that I've really noticed with Boudreau is that we're starting to see more consistent contributions from all members of the team. I'm really loving the more balanced play throughout the lineup and I think this will really pay off in the near term.
- BB has put his faith in Francois Beauchemin to be the Ducks' #1 defenseman and Frenchy is rewarding that trust. In two games under Boudreau, Beauch has played over 30 minutes each night. In each of those games, Beauch has easily been Anaheim's best defenseman, making heady plays while punishing over-zealous forwards. For the first time since we acquired him last year (in the now infamous trade for Joffrey Lupul and Jake Gardiner), I feel that Beuach is reaching the level of play that he was known for in his first stint with the Ducks.
The Bad
- Jonas Hiller had a rough game. He made a couple of brilliant saves, but the third goal was entirely on him. Not only should he have blocked Pierre-Marc Bouchard's back-hander, but the tally really seemed to deflate the team. Jonas was also a rebound machine tonight, although there is some debate about whether or not that is by design (commenter JuMowbray suggested that this may be a strategy to get the puck moving back up the ice).
- Tony Lydman had a pretty bad night himself. He finished an ugly -2 and was on the ice for all three of Minnesota's even-strength goals. While Toni was a revelation last year, he has frequently been caught out of position this season, creating breakaway opportunities for the opposition. Hopefully Lydman turns things around when Lubomir Visnovsky comes back, but his play has definitely been disappointing this season.
- The top line has really struggled the past two games. Yes, Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry have found success on the PP, but the top line (whether with Bobby Ryan or Matt Beleskey) just hasn't gotten it done at even strength. The top line still seems to want to cycle, and I wonder how long Boudreau will let them continue that style of play. When they were on the ice for an even strength goal tonight (Fowler's goal in the third period), it came off a rush. I know there's a value to the cycle, but Boudreau seems to want the team to shoot early and often. We'll see how things develop, but it wouldn't surprise me to see Boudreau try to pair the twins with a faster winger (like he did with Andrew Cogliano in the third) to encourage more opportunities upon entering the zone.
The Ugly
- For the second straight game, the Ducks seemed to revert to a passive style of play for an extended period of time, and it burned them. While last game was somewhat understandable due to the constant penalties, the Ducks just seemed tired in the second period. Not only were they outshot 13-4 in the period, but it was also the period in which Minnesota took the lead. I'm not sure what caused the Ducks to play so tentatively in the second, but I expect this will be a source of focus for Bruce Boudreau in the next few days.
- It's one thing to generate scoring chances, but it's another thing to finish them off. I'm not sure why the Ducks have been so snakebit this year, but it's certainly cost them a number of games this season. Yes, part of this can be attributed to luck, but at some point, you've got to find a way to persevere. Missing wide-open looks just cannot happen at this level, much less three times in a closely contested third period.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In addition to Koivu and Selanne
I would add that Cogs and DSP have also found some early success with the new system. I know it hasn’t exactly transitioned to the score sheet, but they have played good games and I think it will get them points very soon. I think adding Lubo to this D corpse is going to help a lot, and they have really to find someone else to help until he comes back. I would LOVE to see Cumiskey get a shot, he has always seemed like the perfect replacement for Lubo and I’m surprised he hasn’t got a shot. The forwards look good, and Hiller NEEDS some rest so he can make some of these easy saves. Hiller is on pace to play 72 games….that can’t continue. Its the D thats the problem, so I’m hoping for this:
Beauchemin-Sbisa
Fowler-Lydman
Guenin-Cumiskey
I’d like to see anyone that’s not Foster on the blueline.
by Daniel AC on Dec 4, 2011 10:20 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Such a disappointment
Really is just so slow and useless. I really want Lubo back, but even a Guenin-Brookbank pair looks leagues better by now. Maybe Murray is trying to trade him and therefore we will continue to see him on the ice to increase his value. They way he plays though it will probably just hurt his value.
I would put Lydman under UGLY. That guy irritates me now. He couldnt clear the zone and then got a high sticking penalty on the second attempt. Minnesota scored shortly afterwards in 5 on 3. That sequence was pathetic. And then his weak play at the boards resulted in that dumb pass and a goal of the skate of the Minny forward. I wanted to throw something at him after that… 36 shots from a visiting defence minded Minnesota team speaks volumes about the Ducks team defence as such. To me it looks like the Ducks defenders are struggling to defend one on one even not very fast forwards. Another problem is a lack of forecheck from the Ducks forwards. They tend to go deep into the offensive zone for the cycle and then cannot manage to get back when they eventually lose the puck. It seems that far too often the Ducks are shorthanded when the opposition enters the zone. This coupled with a weak one on one defence results in way too many shots on Ducks goal. The first line struggles this year come from their lack of speed and other teams defence adjustment to their game/cycle. I agree that Bruce should try Cogliano on that line.
Hiller is starting to point fingers
In my opinion this is not the way to rally your team. http://www.ocregister.com/sports/hiller-329951-play-guys.html
Someone has to do something. The D has been soft all year, these type of goals have been especially harmful. Hiller makes plenty of saves tonkerp the team in the game, only to have the D abandon him. He should say something.
by Daniel AC on Dec 5, 2011 8:42 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Yah the D is the problem, not Hiller. When you allow cross crease passes and allow them to walk into the crease your going to allow goals that a goalie cant stop. He needs to step up and say something in the locker room to burn a fire under the Defense, but i think hes to soft spoken for that.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 9:37 AM PST up reply actions
just to be clear...
As someone who has played hockey all his life…. passes that cross the paint are ALWAYS 100% the goalies responsibility at every level of hockey
Ive played goalie my whole life and I couldnt disagree more, its the defenses job to 1 not allow/block the pass, and/or tie up the guy so they cant make the easy tap in. Ill point again at the PP goal by Getz, Harding had no chance of getting over to get that cross crease pass, its the D’s job to tie his stick up or tie the body up so he cant get that easy net goal. And thats where our Defense lacks, they allow people to get infront of the net to easily. They are not physical enough infront of the net.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 1:11 PM PST up reply actions
Really? I was always told that if it goes through the paint, it’s the goalie’s pass to stop. I agree there are exceptions to the rule, especially if the puck is closer to the top of the paint, but is it ever his responsibility to stop that pass?
by Daniel AC on Dec 5, 2011 1:25 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Anything close to the goal line yes. Twards the top of the paint no, unless your a super agressive style goalie, but most of thos types of passes your gonna be playing the post, so your job is to slide to the other post, so its not really possible to stop something out that far unless you try to poke it.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 1:30 PM PST up reply actions
I 100% agree with Hockey Phreak
The key factor for a goalie is his stick placement. If he’s trying to block a pass near the top of the paint he has to change the angle of his stick, this 1) takes it out of the play and 2) may possibly redirect the puck between is own legs. from the goal line it’s a lot easier for a goalie to keep the stick in play protecting against a centering feed through the crease. Hiller could have been agreesive and tried to poke check the puck, but thats not really in his style of play.
The problem is
he has let some soft ones in.. and I don’t remember any players calling him out on them. Some of those were backbreakers. Believe me, I understand the role of a goalie, and how they need some help.. but like the other players, sometimes they are asked to make remarkable plays… it is what makes them stand out above the other goalies. They are a part of the defense and as such should share the blame.
I might add, that if he had said these things in the locker room in private, it would be one thing, but airing it out in public is another. I am remembering a few comments here about how unclassy it was for past players calling out RC in public.
First, I think there’s a big difference between calling out a coach and calling out a teammate, one undermines authority while the encourages accountability. I won’t say Hiller doesnt let in soft ones, but I think those are part of the game. Yes, Hiller should have stopped that back hander that gave the Wild the lead, but He made plenty of game savers before that, including Heatley alone inside the dot for the first shot of the game. Fowler bailed Hiller out with q good goal, and then the D gave it right back. Maybe he’s not stealing games for us, but he’s not costing us many either. I think it’s sad that he has to be the voice of the defense.
by Daniel AC on Dec 5, 2011 11:19 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I strongly disagree (here in public… I am such a hypocrite..lol) but calling a teammate out in public will not help his cause. In private he can say what he wants to a team mate… sorta like family. I can call my brothers and sisters anything I want to in private… they might get mad, but hey, its a family thing. Go out and tell everyone else about our fight, and then we have a real problem.. it was a family thing, and you just broke the trust.
It may be hard for you all to believe, but I really like Hiller… I mean really !! He is great and has potential galore. I have a nephew who is just as impressed with him, and wants him to succeed as well… but he still needs his team behind him, it is a two way street. He needs to show outward support, just as they have shown him.
I agree with Daniel, I never denied he dosnt let him some soft goals, but thats part of the game. My point was that most of the goals that he lets in are not his fault, yet everyone seems to want to blame him for letting in 4 goals in one game. Cross crease and tip ins are so hard to stop, I know first hand. Look at the Getz goal, Harding barely got the tip of his glove on it, and the only reason he even touched it is cause Getz shot it more at him then twards the empty side of the net.
As far as not calling someone out in public.. I have mixed feelings with that. I agree that no its not a very good thing to call a teammate out like that, but at the same time when your facing the amount of shots he faces night in and night out and get blamed for letting in to many goals, fustration builds up. Also I dont think he was totally pointing anyone out or blaming anyone, I think he was more trying to say the defense in general has holes that need to be addressed. English isnt his first language after all. On the other hand, who knows what gets said in the locker room, maybe all this stuff has been brought up and if thats the case, bringing it up in private hasnt helped cause the defense is still playing like shit, so maybe this is the next step, bring it out publicly and maybe itll sink in better and they will try and play better cause they dont wanna be in the media like that. Who knows.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 11:59 AM PST up reply actions
It might be the spark… I don’t know… I have been wrong many times. Yes, he has let some soft goals in… all goalies do… it is part of the game.. but I have yet to read about any of the duck players saying… "Well if Jonas had not let that soft goal in, we wouldn’t have lost our momentom. " Might have been said behind closed doors, but not to the media. In the article he didn’t name names… but he did point to one play in particular… so it was not hard to figure out who he was blaming. That player ended up admitting to the mistake… but I didn’t hear him say it made him and Hiller even for the soft one that he let in.
I wasnt necessarily talking about the team blaming him, I was talking about the fans, ext. I dont think the team/management blames him to much otherwise they would pull him and play Ellis more. But, I do think fans see what is posted in various plays and they take that into account, and it effects there play. Just like when someone gets blasted by the media, it tends to effect there play and they play worse cause there trying to play better and there play usually dosnt increase till someone else takes there spot in the media. Im not by any means saying this is right or that im right, just a personal opinion.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 1:14 PM PST up reply actions
Err, that was supposed to say I do think they see what fans post.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 1:20 PM PST up reply actions
I do remember Carlyle calling Hiller out for some soft ones once or twice. Maybe Hiller is on the defensive still.
by Daniel AC on Dec 5, 2011 1:52 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Hiller is 100% right.
Can’t see why he shouldn’t point fingers.
Hell, most of the fans cry for a Pronger in our backend and exactly what Hiller said.
In the Swiss TV he got interviewed in German, and he said that the 2 biggest reasons the Ducks get scored against are
1.) They can’t clear the zone properly
and
2.) the defenders let guys get in the crease or behind them. They need to play a more physical game in their own end, especially in front of their own goal.
Just for the record
Many of the members here know that I am kind of related to Ellis. (Married to my neice) With that said, it does not mean that I am in constant contact with them. I live in Nebraska, they are currently in California (I know, probably could have left that part out.) In fact, the only time that Dan and I have talked much hockey, was when he was waiting to see if he would get traded from Nashville on deadline night. (I just happened to be going through Nashville and they invited me to stay over and meet their new baby girl.) He didn’t get traded and I left the next morning. The other time was when we went to thier home in Omaha and he had just been traded to TB the day before. We talked about the trade and how excited he was about the move.
Other then that, when we have gotten together, it has been family stuff, birthdays an holidays… I spend more time giving their children my “mean look” and trying to convince them I AM their favorite uncle, then I do talking about hockey. I say this to let you know that I really don’t have any inside information except for a few things he might have mentioned to another family member… and those things I believe were said in confidence, so I don’t and won’t share with anyone else.
I am not afraid to criticize his play, and am not offended by fair criticism of his play. We have lived through the twitter epidsode, and the title of being apart of the worst tandem in hockey last year… aka Smellish… and all I can say, is I have never once heard him say anything negative about his team members, and in fact he usually has some great things to say about those I would have figured otherwise. The other thing I do know, is that he is a great fan of Hiller, and understands why he is the favorite.
Theres no doubt that Ellis is a great goalie, and I do wish they would play him alittle more to take some of the work load off Hiller.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 1:21 PM PST up reply actions
But the question remains, why arent they? Whats the reasoning behind it? You would think they would be more cautious with Hiller and try not to push him to much from the Vertigo.. But they are. Just baffling IMO.
by Hockey Phreak on Dec 5, 2011 1:27 PM PST up reply actions
Well I do know that Dan had the groin pull, and asked for some time to heal. In the back of my mind I wondered if he might have thought he was being talked about as a possible trade option when Murray was scrambling… but that is just me. But before that I think they were just desperate, and felt only Hiller could save them. Rumor has it that Gabby likes using two goalies… so I suspect we will see more play by the back ups.
I hope so. Ellis is more than a serviceable back up and I think if he wasn’t hurt, being able to spell Hiller might have kept this streak from being so awful.
by Daniel AC on Dec 5, 2011 1:58 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Fair, but having a back up helps. We haven’t really had one. At least it’s an alternative and gives the coach the ability to point to something going right. Deslauriers isn’t going to see the crease unless we are down 4+ goals.
by Daniel AC on Dec 5, 2011 3:41 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
The Coach has spoken
Gabby seems to think Hiller will be just fine. Boudreau didn’t sound too concerned about any lasting effect by the comments with players in the room.
"If it continues, it would backfire," he said. "I think he’s a pretty quiet guy. That’s out of character for him so I believe guys would take that to heart. … We’ll chat about that.
"He was frustrated. There is a lot of frustration going on right now. Hopefully we can change that."
Too many penalties and a late wakeup
It’s time the Ducks’ new coach spent an hour or two before every game reading the team a section out of the NHL rule book. It seems the team does not know the rules, as they are having way too many penalties. Some of these come from laziness, but i think a liot are due to simple ignorance.
The Ducks are having their usual start to the season. They may not know that the games are actually counting in the standings now. Every year since their Cup win in 2007, they have played as if the season started around Valentine’s Day. We need a coach that will cure them of this habit of waking up too late in the year, and it appears that Boudreau is not the answer. Of course, all the good head coaches are taken, as in the NFL, but maybe they just need an average coach like Wayne Gretzky.
Your statement is noted
and in a month, when the new coach has had time to coach, and the team has adjusted to his system, we will see if your statement still holds water. I am hoping that you have to retract what you said.
That's a bit of a reach
We need a coach that will cure them of this habit of waking up too late in the year, and it appears that Boudreau is not the answer.
He’s had two games. Give him some time.
by PhantomPretender on Dec 5, 2011 9:58 PM PST reply actions
So making the comment the Boudreau is not the answer is acceptable after 2 games? Wow…. I wish we had that medical weed in my state… they answers to life would come soo much faster and clearer.
I wish I lived in a state where we could imply that everyone who disagreed with us was simply on drugs, but we have a broader scope of the world in California.
Cultural insults aside, Boudreau doesn’t have a lot of time. I’m aware that a lot of people are content to let Teemu suffer through this, but I, for one, am not. There isn’t. Lot of time to salvage this season. Maybe Boudreau will be great for us in a couple of years, but the longer this process takes the more damning it is for Teemu.
by Daniel AC on Dec 6, 2011 9:34 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I get what your saying Daniel, but even Murray and Bruce said when he was hired that its not about magically turning this team around. He just wants them to play better, and I’ve seen that at least, and start winning again. Yes, he doesn’t have a lot of time to make Teamu’s “last” season a memorable one but thats not his responsibility.
I agree it’s not Boudreau’s responsibility to make Teemu’s last season a good one, but someone should be responsible for it. I disagreed when Arthur said we should trade him, because I think Teemu wants to tough it out and end it as a Duck. We should, somehow, reward that loyalty. The lack of creativity in the front office is becoming more and more threatening to the long term health of the club. Boudreau, is going to do what he does, and he deserves some time, but at the same time, he hasn’t had the desired “winning” effect. The team is still making some of the same mistakes that they say they know they need to fix. If Boudreau can’t do something in a couple more games, it’s time to ask the next question: Is there something wrong with the team.
I agree
with your last statement. For me it sounded like you were putting this all on Bruce. When I see them doing the same things that they know they shouldn’t, I see Carlyle slipping back into everyone’s heads. I also see a team that is missing one of their best Dmen, and doesn’t have a lot of depth. I see some of the weirdest bounces I’ve ever seen in all the years I’ve watched the Ducks play. Its like watching that play in the Finals against NJ where Broudeur scores on himself, but for every game. I agree that there could be a serious problem with the make up of the team, but I disagree that anything can be done about it this season.
The bounces have been beyond ridiculous. It’s the worst groundhog day ever. There has to be something. Murray needs to dig into the bag of tricks. There’s a surplus of forwards prospects, and that’ll be a problem in the future, we should move someone to see if we can get something back. I choose to believe that Murray is digging and is simply not finding a dancing partner. I just don’t want us to passively accept that things will get better later. I’d like the fan base to show a little more loyalty than that. We should demand good things for Teemu.
I think there is a difference...
Between doing good things for Teemu and being short sighted. Listen I love Teemu, he’s probably going to go down as the most famous player in this franchise (even though it should have been Paul under different circumstances, but thats a whole other discussion). But there is a difference between being a responsible GM and giving Teemu his sunset to ride into. I think there might be problems with the make up of this team, specifically on the back end. And the scariest thing about that is the fact that we have SO many talented forwards that we can play today and in the next few years, but there really isn’t a solution in sight for the Defense. I agree that Murray should deal a package of assets for a really good Defenseman, but I don’t think he should give up assets we need to do so. Would trading Ryan for Chara make us better this season? Yes, but what does it do for our future? You can’t sacrifice players or assets that will be essential to this team just for one player and one season. I think Teemu is great, but I also think once he leaves this team could be better for it. Like with Scotty, not knowing if a hall of famer is coming back every season makes it very difficult for a GM to plan for the upcoming season. Do make the team for today or do you begin to look for their replacement. I think thats one of the things that went wrong with our D and we’ve never really recovered from it. I think the best thing we can do for Teemu is make sure everything off the ice is great and that when he hangs them up to offer him a front office job immediately.
I think when we have this discussion, everything gets put into the “huge” deal perspective. I’m not talking about a big deal, but do something. Get a defensive forward from somewhere that needs a Sexton or a McMillan. We do have a lot of prospects, but prospects eventually get paid. Moving a young forward for a better defenseman or defensive forward might be a good idea.
Completely agree
I don’t think it has to be Bobby Ryan for ______. Just a move that can help out the back end. I think our forwards are looking a lot better. 3 goals should win you a lot of games, and for whatever reason thats not happening.
It is alright
Daniel, I will stop commenting here. I understand you started this blog, and I am the newbie. I have also observed that anyone who questions you is going to get blasted. Not being able to understand a joke, not being able to let people make their opinions be heard without having to correct them is beyond you.
If you think this whole year should be played just for Teemu, then you are short sighted and not supporting the team as a whole. It is alright, I know I will just be labeled the trouble maker, and you will have your supporters call me out… I am a big boy and can take it.
Started isn’t the right term. I told Arthur he should start it and he did. I don’t see how I’ve blasted you for disagreeing with me. My response was pretty controlled. “Jokes” aside, I gave a measured response to the issue at hand. I don’t think the Ducks should wait around all season for Boudreau to right this ship. Teemu gave a great sign of faith by coming back, and he’s been rewarded with a management that shrugs and says “sucks tombs you”.
I don’t go after people who disagree with me, see the conversation I had with hockey phreak earlier in the thread, and almost any disagreement I’ve had with Kevin. I have an opinion and I stick to it, and when I think I’m wrong I change.
Also, if you think I have a squad of enforcers to “go after you”, you don’t pay much attention around here. I’m probably the least liked person around here. Disagreeing with people tends to have that effect.
by Daniel AC on Dec 6, 2011 11:22 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Don't want to get too involved
But I can definitely understand both sides to this argument. To NUboltfan, I’ve totally been there in thinking that arguing against Daniel is like trying to tell a cop he made a mistake. But I also agree with what Daniel is saying in that he just has an opinion and feels very strongly about it. While his rebuttals may feel like attacks, they often are just aggressive arguments. I’m definitely not a “Daniel Supporter”, in fact far from it, but I don’t want people to stop posting or coming here because of it. NUboltfan I agree with a lot of the points you’ve made on this page and have really enjoyed your POV on these things, so don’t let Daniel get you worked up. Just remember that we are all passionate about the same thing, even if its for different reasons, we can all come together and agree that we just want the Ducks to win. PERIOD.
Because I'm bored
And still utterly confused how we lost that game, I went back and analyzed each of the goals and the reasoning for what went wrong on each. It seemed a lot of people know are arguing this very point so know is a good time to share what i saw.
First Goal: Beauchemin has played great all season long, and especially recently. But for the love of god why do we have such a hard time picking up people in front of the net and moving them. For the Dmen, what else are you worrying about when that puck is on the perimeter??? The forwards are doing everything else. The worst part about this type of goal is that I don’t know when or how it is going to be fixed, as its been a consistent problem for a LONG time now.
2nd Goal: I actually think this one lies on Cogliano. You know there’s a 2 on 2 and you take a swing at a mid air puck that sends you flying out of position. Ldyman does a decent job trying to react and take away the pass. It looks like a fairly nice play by the Minnesota forwards to get that pass through and then get it on the stick. I wish the Ducks were capable of handling the puck like that.
3rd Goal: This one is all on Lydman. Why are you stepping up for that check? Its so far up, and then you don’t even really make good contact and you end up blocking Cogliano from taking your spot. So you took out yourself and a teammate. Sbisa stays with his man and I don’t really understand how that finds net. It looks like it hits top shelf or something. Just ridiculous.
4th Goal: I don’t know how a play like that works, but I does and it’s infuriating. I’m not exactly sure what Sbisa is supposed to do there but my guess is that it’s somehow his fault? I bet if he goes for the body we get an interference call and if we don’t he scores. I don’t understand, I thought there was some sort of rule about being in the goalie’s crease and playing the puck? I dunno, I just don’t even know anymore.

by 

















