Chirping The Bench: A Tale of Two Teams
ALLOKAGO:
Let it never again be said in Anaheim that NHL fans shouldn't care about what goes on in the AHL. This past weekend was, I think, a painful lesson in Farm Team Economics for us all.
The moral here? In this story, supply almost always needs to exceed demand. When it doesn't, things turn bad, and they turn bad fast.
I feel bad for the Duck fans. I do, really. I feel your pain. We've been watching Timo struggle all year, and I know it must have been painful to have to deal with it last night. I felt my stomach do an unpleasant flip-flop when it was announced at our game that he was in yours. I had a hope that he'd pull through, but I knew in my soul that he just wasn't ready. It really sucks that this thing will Hiller had to happen, especially at this point, which I know is a crucial moment in your playoff hunt.
The organization itself, however, gets none of my pity. Absolutely none.
This all could have been avoided. The Crunch was promised a veteran goaltender, and we certainly weren't supposed to get him in February. No, we were supposed to start the season with a solid number three for the organization in our net. Yet, for some reason,* that didn't happen. We've been left with two young goaltenders, two goaltenders that have earned 18 Crunch wins between them--not including Emery's win last night--in 55 contests. 18 wins out of 55 games. As of Friday night, we had only won 33 percent of our games.
Now, granted, the goaltending hasn't been the only problem. I've always been a fan of goaltenders, so I've also always hated the "teams win, goaltenders lose" attitude. There's a lot more wrong with the Crunch than the goaltending, and I've talked about it all before here.
However, goaltending is something--as you all well know--that can make or break a season. You could, technically, have a weak offense but yet still win games, as long as your d-corps was strong. You could, technically, have a weak defense but yet still win games, as long as your offense was strong. However, unless your offense is scoring 9 times a night and your defense is a brick wall, your team isn't going anywhere with shaky goaltending. It just doesn't. We've been living that reality here, and it has finally caught up to the Ducks in a big way.
We've been reassured by our owner that Anaheim has learned a lesson here and won't sack us with two young goaltenders again next season. It's not good for Syracuse, and it's not good for the Ducks, not at all. I don't think Anaheim has actually said anything to this effect publicly, but I'm sure they see why an organization needs a solid number three in the AHL, for both our sakes.
Last night's Crunch game was amazing. Shocking. Ridiculous. It was almost too good to be true, to be honest. We haven't seen hockey that good in years. Granted, Rochester isn't much better than we are this year--their record is 25-27-3-2, while ours is 19-30-2-4--so it should have at least been a close match. But a 7-1 score for the good guys was not, in any way, shape, or form, what I expected to come out of that game with.
Now, a few notes on individual players:
Matt Beleskey was atrocious this weekend. Personally, I thought he was the weakest player out there Friday night, regardless of the two points he managed. He was sloppy, unfocused. He took weak shots, had horrible passes, and just didn't look like he actually wanted to play hockey. It was extremely noticeable, and he sort of looked like he was going down that road last night until he took a puck to his upper body and left the game, never to return. I guess he's getting an MRI today. I'm not sure what's going on with him, but I very much hope the Ducks look at more than just the score sheet if they need to call somebody up any time soon.
Nate Guenin was a defenseman who I was unsure about a few weeks ago when I wrote my mid-season reviews, as he was a fairly new player and the Crunch hadn't been home enough for me to really assess him. He already had a black mark against him in my own personal book, as he was described to fans as a "better (because he's younger) Dan Smith." Those of you who know me well probably just cringed as you imagined my reaction to such a statement. Those of you who didn't know Mr. Smith...well, just trust me, those are some really big shoes to fill.
However, Guenin took a decisive step towards filling those shoes Friday and Saturday. His game was nothing short of fantastic. He was physical. He made the big hits. He protected the blue line. He was in our crease, blocking shots. He was visible, and it was for all the right reasons and none of the bad. He made me sit up and pay attention every time he hit that ice.
David Laliberte has successfully cemented himself as my "player to watch and love" this season. He scored an awfully purdy goal last night and played a true 60 minutes of hockey game. He was physical. He did what he needed to do. He took shots; he made really great plays and passes. I was very impressed with him, both games.
We finally had these guys stepping up and doing what they need to do last night. Our 7 goals were scored by 7 different players. I've been harping on this team's tendency to only shoot from the point and to always aim at the goaltender's chest. Coach Holick says he has been, too. Although, personally, I think the team's fantastic performance has more to do with the fan forum that was held Friday night than anything I or Holick has said.
Here's a link to a transcript of it from Lindsay Kramer's blog, if you haven't read it. In short, our owner was very insistent that this team is under-performing, and that such a thing is unacceptable. But, is it possible that the entire team finally deicded to listen to Holick, and the fans are wrong about the coach? Who knows, right?
Whatever the reason, there was a different feel to this team last night. The team we saw Friday was unenthusiastic for most of the game. They looked like they'd rather be elsewhere, maybe eating that meatball sub I talked about last week. They were handed their 4th loss in a row that night and landed themselves in sole possession of the title Worst Team in the League. Those in attendance couldn't help but feel the same way. It was actually described by one fan as watching a hockey game in a morgue.
Although the win last night only leaves us tied for the Worst Team in the League title, it was a small step forward.
I won't lie. Emery's performance had a lot to do with last night. The team played with confidence, as if they just knew their goaltender would stop whatever came his way. And he did, except for one goal I know he wishes he could have back. He looked a heck of a lot better last night than he did Friday. He was more confident, more secure, more steady. He gave the team the boost we needed. It's too bad we didn't get this kind of help sooner. We all might be better off.
Here's hoping better times are ahead, for both teams.
*Editor's Note: The Ducks had acquired Joey MacDonald in hopes of putting an AHL veteran in their next farm team's net, but the veteran netminder had no interest in playing for the Anaheim organization. It seems there was no Plan B, as was the case with Jason Jaffray, but there was definitely a Plan A.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hope that effort continues (even if the results don’t).
I can’t help but feel really bad for you guys. All season long our organization failed to provide a quality veteran net-minder. Then they go out and grab Emery. Let’s face it, as soon as he is in NHL shape, you guys will once again be faced with the same two goalies (J.P. & Timo).
I’m hoping Barstool Bob will get you guys some help by the end of the month because if he doesn’t, it will be slim pickings on the free agency market.
I got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell
I doubt anyone would pick up McElhinney
He could get his game together in the AHL. Not even the Islanders would dare pick up McElhinney off waivers.
by docescobar07 on Feb 20, 2011 11:23 PM PST up reply actions
What kind of an asset do you think McElhinney would be in the AHL? Would he bail for Europe instead? We had that happen one year, when our goaltending was again awful. CBJ tried to send us their backup after they scooped up someone on waivers, but the guy told us to kiss off and bailed for Europe. Bah.
I hope he eventually gets his act together.
He can’t cut it in the NHL so hopefully he can play better in the AHL. He could teach J.P or Timo what not to do. If he bails to Europe then good, no use keeping him on an NHL roster.
by docescobar07 on Feb 21, 2011 10:00 PM PST up reply actions
Thanks, Nate….we’re hoping something will happen. I know our playoff hopes are pretty much on the lowest dimmer setting right now, but fans would still like to see some kind of improvement in the quality of the games before the end of the season. It’d be nice to see some more wins.
I also think some kind of longer-term commitment by the Ducks to fix the goaltending would help out the front office in terms of season ticket sales for next year. Given that they’ve chosen not to raise prices and are looking at some kind of incentive for us to renew, I think they’re a bit worried about sales, too. And probably rightfully so, I guess, though I’ve never really given serious thought to not renewing. There’s not much to do around here, so we’d probably end up going to the games anyway and paying full price.
I know its a little early to start thinking the draft but after this year I wouldn’t be shocked if the brass used a early round pick on a goalie. This has got to get figured out. I think we Duck fans have been spoiled with good goalies over the years. Lets hope Bobkov can step in next year and get some things going right in Syracuse.
I’m liking the possibility of Bobkov from what I’ve been seeing, but the idea of a Bobkov/Timo tandem kind of scares me again. It was a good step of the Ducks to hire Emery’s goaltending coach to stay in SYR whether Emery does or not, as I think in the AHL goaltending coaches are huge, but I’d still like to see a vet who can teach through example.
I would like to see a permanent goaltending coach here next year. Last year, the Crunch hired Karl Goehring to come back and be our goaltending coach, and you wouldn’t believe how much he helped Kevin LaLande. It was phenomenal. It wasn’t enough to save our season or anything, but the difference from beginning of season to end in his game was as big as night and day. When you have two developing goaltenders without a coach specifically for their game 24/7, it becomes so easy for them to sink into bad habits. It almost makes more work for the NHL coach when he comes through town, because then he has to undo all of that.
Totally agree, G coach, and vet netminder…Cmac would probably be good influence in SYR, waivers and all aside…there are the Nabokovs out there, and some others moving around, Bobkov will likely be there next season, hopefully he has a vet partner…
I’m curious, Buick…If Bobkov is here, where do you think that will put Timo? I really can’t believe the Ducks would put us with those two youngsters, and to be honest I don’t think Timo is ready for a number one position. So would he be the odd man out? I’m assuming that JP will go elsewhere in all of this.
I agree, but Bobkov will be just be turning 21 next season, and Timo will be turning 23, I believe. Bobkov will be on his first AHL year, Timo his second. Not exactly the vet/young goalie combo we’re looking for, unless you figure Timo will be with the Ducks, something I don’t really think he’s ready for.



















