Must See TV
ARTHUR:
The NHL's new 10 year, $2 Billion television contract with VERSUS and NBC promises an increase in NHL coverage, both at the network and cable level, as well as the potential for hockey to be the centerpiece of a new sports programming brand under the Comcast umbrella.
However, Ducks fans will remember that, just last season, shortly after eliminating the Presidents' Trophy winning Sharks in the Stanley Cup Playoffs, Anaheim was omitted completely from both the NBC and VERSUS programming schedules for the 2009-10 campaign. In general, NBC has preferred a handful of teams for its limited calendar of games, and VERSUS has done little to fill the void in coverage left by the Peacock's preferences.
Robby, is the new TV contract good or bad for the Ducks?
ROBBY:
The new deal is good to potentially great for the Ducks, and more specifically, their fans. Before I get too far along, I highly recommend reading Puck the Media's take on the deal. It's a great summary, and some of my thoughts are definitely informed by theirs.
For starters, the fact that every playoff game will be available on a national channel is huge. When VERSUS/NBC unveiled their U.S. schedule for the quarterfinal round, it was no shock to Ducks fans that a grand total of zero games were originally planned to be carried (VERSUS decided to throw us a bone, as tonight's Game 5 will be televised nationally). Some have complained that this deal may relegate hockey games to the likes of CNBC or Bravo, but I couldn't really care less what channel the games are on. It's absurd that my parents, who live in San Diego, have only been able to watch Game 3, which was televised on Fox Sports West. For the next ten years, this will not be an issue.
This deal goes from potentially good to great when you consider that NBC/Comcast will nearly double the games they carry each year. I'm not aware if the specifics of how these extra games will be covered has been revealed or not, but it seems reasonable to assume that VERSUS (or whatever it becomes in the next 90 days) might start carrying double-headers for their weekday games. As things currently stand, the channel typically only broadcasts one game on the weekdays, which necessarily favors teams that play a majority of their games in the Eastern time zone. If VERSUS institutes regular double-headers, the chances that Ducks games will be carried nationally increases significantly.
Another potential winner in this deal is NBC's announced coverage of a Black Friday game each year. While it's likely that this game will include the eight or so teams that are usually featured in NBC's Game of the Week, the Ducks do have a tradition of matinee games on Black Friday. I'm not holding my breath that we'll be the nationally televised game here, but at least there's a chance.
Lastly, this is a ten year deal. From the analysis I've read on this deal, there doesn't appear to be any kind of escape-hatch for NBC/Comcast if they change their mind a few years out. Since this is now effectively a medium-term investment for them, it would make sound business sense for NBC/Comcast to get this right and make the necessary investments to make this deal a profitable one. While the Ducks may not directly benefit from this in the short term, it would seem to be a positive move for the continued health of the sport.
In summary, I'm pretty happy with this deal. I'm not suddenly expecting to see a Ducks-heavy schedule on VERSUS next season, but I do think this helps players like Corey Perry get more of the national cred they deserve. I still think the Ducks have work to do on their own regional broadcasting agreements, but that's another topic altogether.
ARTHUR:
I've grown accustomed to Daniel's pessimism, so I'll need to regroup after all the positive thinking you've displayed.
I agree that the ten year window proffers nothing but opportunities, and in that sense, it can be good for Anaheim. They are not now a team that VERSUS or NBC care to highlight. You can probably point to the poor ratings performance of their Stanley Cup Finals for that.
While I agree that the East Coast feed makes it easier to feature teams in the Eastern Time Zone, I believe only the Ducks and Hurricanes were omitted from the national broadcast schedule last year i.e. the Kings and Sharks weren't.
But Paul Kariya was once a mainstay in the NHL on FOX campaign, as he (and subsequently the Dynamic Duo of he and Selanne) was an offensive dynamo in the Dead Puck Era. So, whatever prejudices there may be against Anaheim, marketability shouldn't be one of them. The assumption that no player from Anaheim can create compelling television would be a new one.
And somewhere in that ten year window, the Ducks have the opportunity both to prove themselves improved ratings performers and to build the kind of team that conforms to the VERSUS/NBC criteria for national broadcast worthy hockey.
So, I join in your sentiment that it won't happen tomorrow, but somewhere in the ten years after that, the Ducks have nothing but opportunities to become a major beneficiary of the new deal.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If the Ducks make the postseason next year,
I am already excited about being able to watch all Ducks playoff games up here in the Bay Area.
CALIFORNIA ANGELS . . . ANAHEIM DUCKS . . . CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS
It’s not because of this deal, but the Ducks are guaranteed at least 2 Versus games next year with the European Premier games in Finland and Sweden. So, I guess that’s a start.
One slightly negative comment though: As things are constructed now, if Versus were to add double headers it wouldn’t help the Ducks much as they don’t generally play on Monday’s and Tuesdays, when Versus broadcasts. And you’d have to think that if they add extra days they would prefer to broadcast in primetime in the east.
Still I have to agree, there isn’t really anywhere to go but up for the Ducks in terms of national exposure on Versus/NBC, and the worst they could do in the playoffs is hide us on USA or Bravo or something.
It’s not as if the Ducks choose to not play on Monday and Tiesday nights. I’m pretty sure that Versus has exclusivity rights that prevent other games from being Scheduled against the ones they broadcast. The reason the Ducks don’t play when Versus is broadcasting is because they aren’t chosen for the Versus games.
However, if Versus really does expand to double headers, I suppose even the Ducks will get a bone or two. Of course, I’m not holding my breath.
by Daniel AC on Apr 22, 2011 7:33 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m sure we’ll get more games, just because they are showing more. Even if they only show mainly the east coast, we’ll probably get some games when we go on a east coast trip. We’ll get some more next year, because Corey Perry was in contention for the Hart, and we did make the playoffs. This season, we were coming off not making the playoffs, and losing Scotty, so they thought we were going to be a 11th place team, in a smaller market. We are also guaranteed to double our Versus games with the Europe trip at the minimum, lol. I think we’ll get about 4-5 games next year.
If you can watch every single Ducks game on Fox sports or KDOC then why does it matter that we aren’t showcased on VS or NBC? Oh right it doesn’t. Guys quit whining and realize they don’t show ducks games because nobody wants to watch the Ducks play. The ratings during the 07 Stanley Cup Finals proved that.
It matters for the people outside of the KDOC and Fox Sports area. So, todays game is on Versus, because the Detroit series was a sweep. However, Versus is probably blacked out in socal anyways.
Exactly
San diego has ducks fans. Not a ton of them, but they should be able to see their team, especially in the playoffs.
by PhantomPretender on Apr 22, 2011 11:23 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
National television goes a long way to establishing a national reputation. If people like, I don’t know Colin Campbell, had been watching our games all year instead of just seeing highlights, maybe he realizes we aren’t as dirty as everyone likes to think. If writers are watching a few Ducks games that are nationally televised earlier in the season, maybe they realize that he’s been playing well all season instead of just the last two months.
It matters that we get national exposure, it affects the views of people who are in a position to affect how the game goes for the team.
I care because I live in Oregon but love my Ducks. The only way I can watch them is through online streams, which are more often than not terrible feeds. So it matters to some of more than those that live locally.
same with me in denver. I love this team and it will be nice to see them play more often.
These are the demands and sayings of tohon
However, Ducks fans will remember that, just last season, shortly after eliminating the Presidents’ Trophy winning Sharks in the Stanley Cup Playoffs, Anaheim was omitted completely from both the NBC and VERSUS programming schedules for the 2009-10 campaign.
That was your punishment for taking out the good guys in Teal! I highly doubt the punishment was only for one year as well. :)
GO SHARKS!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin (see profile for more info on this quote)
Good guys in teal? Hate to break it to you Angy but there is no such thing. It’s like Santa Claus.
by Newport Rebel on Apr 22, 2011 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions
This is actually pretty funny...
Since JasonF and I were talking the other day about how Bryz loves warm weather places and wondered if he would accept a move to Winnipeg.
Well, if the Coyotes do move, here’s his answer:
http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=363238
So I have a question for everyone: if Hiller doesn’t recover (and I know he is locked up for another 3 years), either one of Ellis or Emery is let go, do we go after Bryz again? Or do we stick with Timo, Hiller (if recovered) and/or Ellis/Emery?
"That might've been a little push, but that was a major flop. That would make Vlade Divac very proud." - Jerry Reynolds
Ellis is already under contract, so I’m guessing he’s staying. I think that Emery has been solid, but we still don’t know if he can hold up for a full season. I’m cool with Emery/Ellis.
It's a good option.
Maybe not over a whole season though.
"That might've been a little push, but that was a major flop. That would make Vlade Divac very proud." - Jerry Reynolds
Bryz will probably get between 4.5-6 million on his new deal. Add that to the 1.5 we owe Ellis for next year, and you’re looking at a cap hit of anything from 6-7.5. I know we’ll have the space, but I’m not sure we’ll have the money.
Agreed.
The cap situation that involves Bryz scares me, which is why I still think the best option is to keep hoping for Jonas.
By the way, what kind of money do you think Emery will command this off-season?
"That might've been a little push, but that was a major flop. That would make Vlade Divac very proud." - Jerry Reynolds
I would venture to say Emery couldn’t get what Niemi got at the start of this past season. So I’d say 2mil would be the absolute ceiling for him. But I’d venture to say more in the 1.5mil range. He still hasn’t proven that he can handle a fun season taking the majority of the starts with him health.
First let me say that we should stick by Hiller. But what if Hiller is done? Could we not use his 4.5 on a guy like Bryz?
by Newport Rebel on Apr 23, 2011 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions
In theory, yes. I just think that Bryz is going to get more than 4.5. If he does, I don’t think we can afford him.
by Daniel AC on Apr 23, 2011 10:35 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions

by 















